ABSTRACT
Oral cancer is at rise in our population due to increasing use of areca nut [Betel nut] with or without tobacco. It is the second frequent malignant tumour for both the gender in Pakistan. This non-interventional case control study was carried out with the aim to explore saliva as diagnostic medium for detecting interleukins [IL] 6 and 8 as biomarkers of pre-malignant lesions [PML] and oral carcinoma. Total 105 subjects were recruited and were divided into three groups "A", "B" and "C" each comprising of 35 subjects. Group "A" comprised of cases with strong clinical evidence of oral PML. Group "B" constitute clinical and histologically proven OSCC and group "C" include disease free subjects as controls. Saliva from all the recruited subjects was procured by drooling method and stored at-20[degree sign]C before further process. All the collected samples were centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 15 minutes at 4[degree sign]C. Supernatant fluid was used in ELISA for detection and quantification of IL-6 and IL-8. Data was analysed by using Chi-square test and multivariate analysis was done by non-parametric test. P-value of 0.05 was taken as standard reference. Significant co-relation was found for qualitative salivary detection of IL-6 and IL-8 among the groups [P<0.001 and <0.0001 respectively]. Regarding quantitative salivary concentration of leukotrienes, no significant co-relation was found in levels of IL-6 among the groups while there was significant association of IL-8 levels between the groups [P<0.0001].On post Hoc multiple comparison, significant co-relation was found among oral PML group and controls [P=0.001] and OSCC group and control [P=<0.0001]. In conclusion salivary detection of IL-6 and IL-8 could be used as probable biomarker for early detection of oral PML and OSCC in etiologically distinct population of Pakistan
ABSTRACT
To evaluate salivary detection of HPV-16 and 18 would be feasible and informative biomarker for oral pre-malignant and malignant lesion in our population. This non-interventional, case control study was carried out at department of E.N.T, Head and Neck Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Dow Medical College and Civil Hospital Karachi, Pakistan between July 2011 to December 2012. Total of 105 cases were recruited. These were divided in three groups 'A', 'B' and 'C having 35 subjects each. Group'A' constitutes patients having strong clinical evidence of oral pre-malignant lesions [PML]. Group 'B' includes historically proven oral squamous cell carcinoma [OSCC] and Group 'C' comprised disease free subjects as controls. After taking informed consent, relevant clinical history was recorded on institutional approved performa. Saliva from all subjects was procured by standard 'drooling method'. Samples were stored at +4°C and later transferred to Laboratory to store at-20°C before further process. Samples werKfcentrifuged at 4500 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C. Cell pellets sediments were used for identification of HPV-16 and 18 by real-time PCR method. Data was entered and analysed using SPSS version 16. P-value of 0.05 was taken as standard. In group 'A', HPV-16 was detected in 3 [8.6%] cases while HPV-18 was not detected in any of the subject. In group 'B', HPV-16 was detected in 07 [20%] while HPV-18 was found in 06 [17.1%] cases. Mixed HPV-16 and HPV-18 were found in 02 [5.7%] cases. In group 'C, HPV-16 was detected in 03 [8.6%] while HPV-18 was not detected in any of the subjects. Significant relationship was observed between the groups for HPV-18 detection [P= 0.002] while for HPV-16, no significant association was found [P= 0.245]. HPV infection for the causation of oral cancer cannot be fully established possibly due to small sample size. More over differences in genetic makeup, environment, indulgence in peculiar risk factor habits, sexual practices and difficult evaluation of the acquisition of viral load due to socio-cultural and religious restrictions could be the reason
ABSTRACT
To evaluate salivary detection of interleukin 6 and 8 and high risk HPV-16 and 18 are informative biomarkers of Oral Pre-malignant Lesion [PML] and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma [OSCC] in our population. July 2011 to December 2012. Total 105 cases were included. The subjects were divided in three groups 'A', 'B' and 'C' having 35 participants each. Group 'A' comprised of patients having strong clinical evidence of oral PML. Group 'B' constitutes histologically proven OSCC and Group 'C' includes disease free subjects as controls. Relevant clinical history was recorded after informed consent on institutional approved performa. Saliva was collected as per standard drooling method'. Samples were stored at +4oC and later transferred to Dow Diagnostic, Research and Reference Laboratory to store it at -20oC before further process. Samples were subjected to centrifugation at 4500 rpm for 15 minutes at 4oC. Supernatant fluid phase was used in ELISA for detection and quantification of IL6 and IL8. . Cell pellets were used for identification of high risk HPV-16 and 18 by real-time PCR. Data was entered and analyzed on SPSS version 16. P-value of 0.05 was taken as standard reference. In group 'A', IL6 was not detected in almost all the subjects except one case. IL8 was detected in 26/35 [74.3%] subjects and not detected in 09 [25.7%] cases. In group 'B', IL6 was detected in 13 [37.1%] cases and in 22 [62.9%] cases, it cannot be detected. IL8 was detected in 33 [94.3%] and it was not detected in 02 [5.7%] subjects. It is observed that IL8 is consistently found raised in group 'A' and 'B'. In group 'C', IL6 was not detected in any of the subject while IL8 was detected in 10[28.6%] cases. Significant association was found for qualitative salivary detection of IL6 and IL8 between the groups [P= < 0.0001 and < 0.0001 respectively]. Regarding quantitative salivary concentration of IL6 and IL8, no significant co-relation was found in salivary levels of IL6 between the groups while there was significant association of salivary IL8 levels between the groups [P= <0.0001]. On post Hoc multiple comparison, significant co-relation was found in IL8 levels between oral PML group and controls [P=0.001] and OSCC group and controls [P= <0.0001]. In group 'A', HPV-16 was detected in salivary samples of 3 [8.6%] cases while HPV-18 was not detected. In group 'B', HPV-16 was detected in the salivary samples of 07 [20%] cases while HPV-18 was detected in 06 [17.1%] cases. Mixed HPV-16 and HPV-18 were found in 02 [5.7%] cases. In group 'C', HPV-16 was detected in 03[8.6%] cases while HPV-18 was not detected in any of the subjects. Significant relationship was observed between the groups for salivary HPV-18 detection [P= 0.002] while for detection of HPV-16, no significant association was found [P= 0.245]. Salivary concentration of IL6 and IL8 in oral PML and oral cancer are useful biomarkers in our population. Detection of HPV infection for the causation of oral cancer cannot be fully established possibly due to small sample size. More over different genetic makeup, environmental and geographic differences, indulgence in peculiar risk factor habits and different sexual practices compared to west due to socio-cultural and religious restrictions could be the reason
ABSTRACT
Penetrating injuries of face are not uncommon. Bullets or pallets may be lodged anywhere in the cavities of skull as a result of firearm injury. Lodgment of a bullet within the orbit through nose is uncommon. An eighteen 18 years old married woman sustained a bullet injury, which entered through lateral wall of the nose and lodged at left orbital apex area. The bullet was removed endoscopically via left nostril without any damage to the eye or disturbance in vision
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Firearms , Endoscopy , Facial Injuries , Eye Foreign Bodies , Pregnancy Complications/surgery , Wounds, Gunshot/surgeryABSTRACT
The objective of the study is to find out the common pharmacologic agents causing ototoxicity in our region with their pattern of presentation and effects on the inner ear. This study was conducted at department of Ear, Nose, Throat, Head and Neck Surgery, Civil Hospital Karachi, over a period of three years from January 1998 to December 2000. A total of 44 patients were included who presented at ENT department with the diagnosis of ototoxicity. The diagnosis was established in each case by taking detailed history, through ENT examination and related investigations. All these patients were followed up regularly for a maximum of six months. Out of44 patients, 32 were male and 12 were female patients with mean age of 42.2 years. Majority of the patients had some form of cochleotoxicity with symptoms of deafness in 95.4% and tinnitus in 36.6% of the cases. Vestibular toxicity with symptoms of vertigo and sense of imbalance were presented in 29.5% of the cases. 26 patients received only one ototoxic drug while 18 patients had received more than one ototoxic drug at one time. Gentamycin was the commonest offending agent for ototoxicity in 40.9% of the cases. In this study no patient of ototoxicity was found due to macrolide antibiotics, salicylates or any non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Sensori-neural hearing loss in majority of the patients was moderate to severe in nature